Canadian C-spine Rule
For: Clinically important cervical spine injury after blunt trauma (need for imaging)
Website-only page: no separate test card in the book, which discusses this in its ‘The neck’ chapter.
An injury to the bones, joints or ligaments of the neck after trauma that matters for treatment. The Canadian C-spine Rule decides who needs imaging; it does not diagnose the injury.
Best used to rule outLikelihood ratios calculated from the published sensitivity and specificity.
Caution: Developed and validated by the same research group in emergency departments; figures exclude the 10% of patients whose range of motion was not checked.
These figures have not been confirmed against the full paper (checked against the abstract or a secondary source only).
How it is done
For alert (GCS 15), stable patients aged 16 or over after blunt trauma to the head or neck. The 2001 study excluded patients who were pregnant, had penetrating trauma, acute paralysis, known spinal disease (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal stenosis) or previous neck surgery, or were injured more than 48 hours earlier, so the rule has not been tested in them. Three steps. (1) Is there any high-risk factor: age 65 or over; a dangerous mechanism (fall from 0.9 m (3 feet) or more, or from 5 stairs, axial load to the head such as a diving injury, high-speed car crash over 100 km/h, rollover or ejection, motorised recreational vehicle or bicycle collision); or pins and needles in the arms or legs? If yes, image. (2) Is there any low-risk factor that allows range of motion to be tested safely: simple rear-end car crash, sitting in the emergency department, walking at any time since the injury, delayed onset of neck pain, or no midline neck tenderness? If none, image. (3) Can the patient actively turn the neck 45° to the left and to the right? If not, image. If they can, no imaging is needed.
What the studies found
Decision rule for imaging after neck trauma — a rule-out tool. A negative rule means imaging is not needed; a positive rule means 'image', not 'injury present' (LR+ only 1.81). Validation: Stiell 2003, 9 Canadian emergency departments, 8,283 patients, 169 (2.0%) with a clinically important injury. The figures are for the 7,438 patients whose range of motion was assessed; in 845 (10.2%) the doctors did not check range of motion as the rule requires. Counting those patients as rule-positive, sensitivity stayed at 99.4% and specificity was 40.4%. The rule missed 1 important injury; the NEXUS criteria missed 16 in the same patients. Derivation: Stiell 2001, 8,924 adults, sensitivity 100% (95% CI 98–100%), specificity 42.5% (95% CI 40–44%). Developed and validated by the same research group, in emergency departments.
What the numbers mean
- Positive result: barely informative: a positive result changes little.
- Negative result: a strong rule-out: a negative result makes the diagnosis very unlikely.
The ladder: what a result does to your estimate
| If you thought | After a positive | After a negative |
|---|---|---|
| 10% | 17% | under 1% |
| 30% | 44% | under 1% |
| 50% | 64% | 1% |
Calculated from the likelihood ratios above. Read the caution above before relying on these. For any other starting estimate, use the probability calculator.
Work out what a result means for your patient: probability calculator
Source
Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(26):2510–2518. Journal article (DOI) · single study
Also cited: Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1841–1848. Journal article (DOI)
Website-only page, added to the library on 9 October 2026. Rule It In, Rule It Out discusses this but has no separate test card for it. Figures independently checked against the sources cited above; any note above says where only the abstract could be checked.
Get the book for the neck questions that matter: nerve root or referred pain, which myelopathy signs count, and when a neck after trauma needs imaging
The ‘The neck’ chapter of Rule It In, Rule It Out discusses this, alongside how to do and read each test in the chapter.
Coming in late 2026 as a PDF and a paperback. Join the list to hear when it's out
One study, one test, once a month
Rule It In is a free evidence letter for musculoskeletal clinicians: one recent study explained, one examination test with its real numbers. From Trokos, publisher of Rule It In, Rule It Out.
Free when you confirm your email: a one-page PDF of the strongest special tests to rule in and rule out, with tests that carry a caution flagged separately.
By subscribing you agree to receive Rule It In by email, about once a month. You will get a confirmation email first, and nothing is sent until you click it. Your address is stored by Kit (Kit.com, United States) and used only for this newsletter; Kit records which issues are opened and which links are clicked. Unsubscribe with one click in any issue. Privacy.